News
[03/14] Construction begins on World Trade Center memorial; families protest underground design [03/13] Construction Begins on WTC Memorial [03/09] Three Students Held in Ala. Church Fires [03/08] Two Are Arrested in Ala. Church Arsons [03/08] Court signs off on unusual restraining order against Paris Hilton
More...
Articles
Tax Litigation
While most taxpayers do not experience difficulties with tax issues, or resolve their problems at an early stage, individuals with continuing tax disputes may choose to resolve their claims against the Internal Revenue Service in federal court. Taxpayers can bring tax litigation in one of three federal courts that operate independently of the IRS. Depending on the case, Claims Court, District Court, or Tax Court may provide the appropriate forum. The taxpayer may choose to bring his or her dispute in these courts prior to completing the IRS internal appeals process, but some judges will not hear a case that has not been through this administrative procedure. Additionally, a tax court judge may fine a taxpayer if he or she feels that the lawsuit was brought to delay tax payment.
More...
Understanding Discovery
In our legal system, we have determined that it works to everyone's advantage if there are as few surprises as possible in the course of a lawsuit. Since the late 1940s, the federal court system has required disclosure of all relevant facts and documents to the other side prior to trial, and virtually every state has followed its lead. That disclosure is accomplished by discovery. Discovery takes three basic forms: written discovery, document production and depositions.
More... | |
Case Summaries
[03/20] Lincoln Prop. Co., N.C., Inc. v. Travelers Indem. Co. An insured may not bring separate actions against its insurer for breaching its obligation to defend a claim against the insured and for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in the handling of the claim since the two claims involve breach of the same primary right.
More...
[03/17] B. Fernandez & Hnos. v. Kellogg USA, Inc. Appeal of denial of motion to intervene is reversed and remanded, and a preliminary injunction vacated, where the moving party met the requirements for intervention but would destroy complete diversity, and thus the district court must decide how best to proceed under the indispensable party analysis of FRCP 19(b).
More...
|